|
|
Home | About PAC | Committees | Forums | Membership | Newsletter | Reports | Meetings | Training | Publications | Contacts | Guestbook | Other Links |
PAC REPORT TO PASC 1998
The first signing of the Pacific
Accreditation Cooperation (PAC) Multilateral Recognition Agreement (MLA) occurred in
Guangzhou">
Home
| About PAC
| Committees
| Forums
| Membership
| Newsletter
| Reports
| Meetings
| Training
| Publications
| Contacts
| Guestbook
| Other Links
The first signing of the Pacific
Accreditation Cooperation (PAC) Multilateral Recognition Agreement (MLA) occurred in
Guangzhou, China, on 24 January 1998. The first four members of PAC to join the MLA were
the China National Accreditation Council for Registrars (CNACR), the Joint Accreditation
System of Australia and New Zealand (JAS-ANZ), the Standards Council of Canada (SCC), and
the Japan Accreditation Board for Conformity Assessment (JAB). Signing of the MLA followed a detailed
evaluation of each of the signatories accreditation programs. These evaluations were
conducted jointly with the International Accreditation Forum (IAF), using the published
IAF Procedures, under the direction of a Joint IAF/PAC Interim MLA Management Committee.
Following the evaluations, the Joint Committee recommended that the four PAC applicants be
invited to sign to both the PAC and the IAF MLAs. This recommendation was endorsed
by the members of PAC. The consequence of joining the PAC MLA is
that ISO 9000 conformity assessment certificates issued by certification / registration
bodies accredited by any one of the four members of the MLA will be recognised both in the
world wide IAF program and in the Asia-Pacific Region. The first signing of the PAC MLA was a
considerable achievement, and a major step in achieving one of PACs major
objectives. PAC was established as an association of accreditation bodies operating in the
Asia Pacific region in July 1995. One of its primary objectives was to develop
multilateral recognition of conformity assessment accreditations within the framework of
the International Accreditation Forum. It has achieved that objective in only two and a
half years. PAC will now assist other members to meet
the program requirements for membership of the MLA. It is PACs objective that in the
future certification / registration bodies in most of the economies in the Asia-Pacific
Region will be able to issue conformity assessment certificates which will be recognised
throughout the world. The Fourth Meeting of the PAC Plenary was
held in Chiba, Japan, on 3 June, 1997. PAC now has twelve Full Members and four Associate
Members. At the 1997 meeting PAC changed its
structure to better manage its affairs. The Plenary has delegated more responsibilities to
the Executive Committee, including responsibility for managing the MLA peer assessment
program and for managing the MLA. PAC decided that, as a matter of policy, it
would adopt IAF application guidance, policy and procedure documents with only the minimum
change needed to meet PAC needs. As a consequence of that decision, PAC had abolished all
Working Groups responsible for application guidance, policy and procedure documents. A new
Technical Committee was established, consisting of one representative from each PAC
member. The Technical Committee will be responsible for assessing IAF application
guidance, policy and procedure documents, and suggesting any changes to meet PAC needs. As part of the restructure agreed in Japan,
PAC is has revised its Memorandum of Understanding to clarify the role of the Executive
Committee and to vary its membership and voting rules. The criteria for Associate
Membership has been widened to include any national, regional or international
organisations which represent the interests of a group or groups of those involved in the
use or implementation of programmes for certification or registration, and which subscribe
to the objectives of PAC. The rules for voting in PAC meetings now
provide that all members have an equal vote, subject only that the total number of votes
from Associate Members may not exceed one third of the total of the votes from Full
Members. PAC also decided to simplify its method of
calculating membership fees, which will in future be the same for all member bodies. The Fifth meeting of PAC will be held at
the Gold Coast, Queensland, in the first week of November 1998. Current members of PAC are Full Members: Home
| About PAC
| Committees
| Forums
| Membership
| Newsletter
| Reports
| Meetings
| Training
| Publications
| Contacts
| Guestbook
| Other Links Copyright
© 1998 Pacific Accreditation Cooperation. All rights reserved.

PAC REPORT TO PASC 1998
Joint Accreditation System of Australia
and New Zealand (JAS-ANZ)
Standards Council of Canada (SCC)
CNAB (Chinese Taipei)
China National Accreditation Council for
Registrars (CNACR), Peoples Republic of China
The Accreditation Body of Indonesia
(KAN-BSN)
The Japan Accreditation Board for
Conformity Assessment (JAB)
Korea Accreditation Board (KAB)
Department of Standards Malaysia (DSM)
Bureau of Product Standards (BPS), The
Philippines
Singapore Accreditation Council (SAC)
Chinese National Accreditation Board
(CNAB), Chinese Taipei
Bureau of Commodity Inspection and
Quarantine, Ministry of Economic Affairs, Chinese Taipei (BCIQ)
National Accreditation Council (NAC),
Thailand
Associate Members
National Institute of Metrology,
Standardisation and Industrial Quality (INMETRO), Brazil
Hong Kong Laboratory Accreditation Scheme
(HOKLAS)
The Independent International Organisation
of Certification (IIOC)
Standardisation, Testing and Quality
Certification Directorate, Government of India (STQC)

This document maintained by the WWW Designer Wednesday, November 20, 2002
.